National Workplace Research Firm Recognizes IPM’s Culture
Integrated Project Management Company, Inc. (IPM) has received national recognition for its culture. As part of its Top Workplaces awards, national employee research firm Energage…
By C. Richard Panico, President & CEO, Integrated Project Management Company, Inc.
There have been a plethora of studies and surveys confirming the impact of culture on organizational performance. CEO after CEO has attested to the importance of culture on the organization’s ability to consistently perform at a high level. However, much less is said about the inextricable connection between culture and an organization’s ability to develop and execute its strategy. How can you reasonably develop a plan—especially a bold one that involves transforming an organization’s business model, processes, and organizational structure to be more competitive and achieve growth goals—without an understanding of the norms, behaviors, attitudes, and other potential influences that impact personnel engagement, commitment, and trust?
While the executive suite understands the impact of culture, they continually set it aside or attempt to shape it through superficial tactics that usually include corporate marketing and promotional campaigns that have little to no lasting impacts on changing the culture. Why is this?
Organizational culture is a direct reflection of leadership, whether we like it or not. Ironically, I have had discussions with several leaders over the years who criticized their culture and drew no correlation between themselves and the culture. Recently, I met with an executive who shared his concern about the negative impacts that a fully remote option was having on personnel engagement and performance. When I asked how often he was in the office, he responded (after hesitating) about 20% of the time. I would bet a thousand dollars against a dime that the real percentage is significantly lower.
While cultural aspirations are founded on communicated core values that drive expected behaviors and peripheral characteristics that determine the required attributes to achieve business objectives, executive behaviors and decisions determine the “influential values,” these most often result in the unintended cultural consequences or, in other words, a culture by default.
Preserving an enabling, positive, and motivating culture requires consistent leadership investment, attention, and nurturing. Changing a negative or counter-productive culture requires all these plus a lot of time—in many cases, years. Most of this time must be devoted to establishing leadership trust and confidence. Unfortunately, unless there is a sincere desire and effort that extends well beyond internal marketing and promotional campaigns and a paradigm shift in what is expected of leaders, efforts will fall short or have an unsustainable cultural impact.
Industry: Multi-industry
— Published March 6, 2024